Existing systems
- Cameras and video
- Access control
- Alarms and intercoms
- Health and service data
System architecture hypothesis
Cobalt would connect existing physical-security systems to governed data, service workflows, ITSM, analytics, and the people responsible for resolution.
Explore the system
Proposed architecture
Selected events move through a controlled operating path. Each stage has a clear job, and each customer remains isolated from every other customer.
On a phone, portrait shows the architecture step by step. Landscape preserves the full system map.
A concrete data path
The event becomes useful only when it gains context, reaches an owner, and remains open through verified restoration.
An approved system reports that a camera is offline.
Site, device, history, warranty, and service context are added.
The workflow creates or updates service work and routes ownership.
The partner technician records activity and completes remediation.
System health or a person confirms restoration before closure.
AI and controls
The data and control foundation comes first. AI can then help people understand events, find patterns, search history, summarize context, and choose the next action.
Operating boundary AI supports technical service operations. Customer security protocols continue to govern incidents involving people, threats, or emergency decisions.
Deployment and ownership
Cobalt would maintain the reusable product layer. Each customer deployment would keep its own data, permissions, event definitions, workflows, and operating history.
Data, policies, access, workflows
Data, policies, access, workflows
Data, policies, access, workflows
No pooled raw customer-security data and no cross-customer access.
Cobalt supplies
Customer and local partner retain
Start with a bounded pilot
Begin with selected systems, a focused set of technical-health workflows, one local service team, and clear measures for access, resolution, delivery effort, and repeatability.